Our aim is to work closely alongside our clients to provide them with robust and effective representation to achieve the desired outcome. Amosu Robinshaw Solicitors is a well established firm based in Croydon, South London. We are community people and focus on helping the community from a personal and business standpoint. Our range of services are featured within this website.
Our experience is vast in a variety of areas, from assisting local business owners with health and safety matters, to resolving long-running cases of a very serious nature, and helping young people who find themselves in trouble with the police. Our success and reputation is built on having an approachable and professional style whilst delivering no nonsense and robust advice and assistance.
This firm is built upon a foundation of honest advice, which means being open and honest with you about all the facts surrounding your case. We are valued for our transparent, no-nonsense approach, so that together we can achieve the best possible resolution to your case.
Our experience is vast in a variety of areas, from assisting local business owners with health and safety matters, to resolving long-running cases of a very serious nature, and helping young people who find themselves in trouble with the police. Our success and reputation is built on having an approachable and professional style whilst delivering no nonsense and robust advice and assistance.
This firm is built upon a foundation of honest advice, which means being open and honest with you about all the facts surrounding your case. We are valued for our transparent, no-nonsense approach, so that together we can achieve the best possible resolution to your case.
Services
Ola qualified in 1996 with a well known and respected former Brixton firm, Hallmark Atkinson & Wynter.
Anthony is currently the Managing Solicitor/Director of the firm.
Anthony qualified in 2001 and has been with Amosu Robinshaw since 2003, having been partner, then Director, since 2006.
Trudy, qualified as a solicitor in 2003.
Along with Ola, she qualified with the well known and respected former Brixton firm, Hallmark Atkinson & Wynter.
June is our in-house barrister and has been working in some capacity with us for the last 10 years.
Anthony is currently the Managing Solicitor/Director of the firm.
Anthony qualified in 2001 and has been with Amosu Robinshaw since 2003, having been partner, then Director, since 2006.
Trudy, qualified as a solicitor in 2003.
Along with Ola, she qualified with the well known and respected former Brixton firm, Hallmark Atkinson & Wynter.
June is our in-house barrister and has been working in some capacity with us for the last 10 years.
Very well informed, treated me well with respect & gave their honest opinions with no make up attached to it.
I would like to thank you for all your help in this complex family matter.
Your support has made a big difference and I have gained a lot more than I hoped for - thank you again.
I am very grateful to Amosu Robinshaw and was very impressed with your staff, level of service and the advice you gave me.
It made a difficult situation clearer and enabled us to resolve the business position we found ourselves in.
I would like to thank you for all your help in this complex family matter.
Your support has made a big difference and I have gained a lot more than I hoped for - thank you again.
I am very grateful to Amosu Robinshaw and was very impressed with your staff, level of service and the advice you gave me.
It made a difficult situation clearer and enabled us to resolve the business position we found ourselves in.
If an individual is found to have benefited from the Proceeds of Crime, then the Courts have the power to confiscate money and property from that individual.
The Court will first set the "Benefit Amount" and looks at the individual's finances to identify the "Available Amount" (if any) to seek to recover.
The individual can challenge both amounts but must either prove he has not benefited to the extent alleged by the Prosecuting Authority or does not have the "Available Amount" as suggested.
We have specialist knowledge of applying to the High Court for a Certificate of Inadequacy i.e.
The Court will first set the "Benefit Amount" and looks at the individual's finances to identify the "Available Amount" (if any) to seek to recover.
The individual can challenge both amounts but must either prove he has not benefited to the extent alleged by the Prosecuting Authority or does not have the "Available Amount" as suggested.
We have specialist knowledge of applying to the High Court for a Certificate of Inadequacy i.e.
Benefit Fraud is usually governed by the Social Security Administration Act 1992.
Recent Guidance from the Director of Public Prosecutions has suggested some benefit fraud cases should be charged under the Fraud Act 2006 which brings a maximum sentence of 10 years of instead of 7 years.
The procedure is that individuals are usually invited into council offices or benefit agencies for an interview under Caution, regarding a possible over-payment or allegation(s) of clear-cut fraud(s).
We have for a number of years specialised in these cases and have had success in defending cases in the Court of Appeal where Prosecution Authorities have sought to challenge decisions made by Crown Court Judges in our favour.
Recent Guidance from the Director of Public Prosecutions has suggested some benefit fraud cases should be charged under the Fraud Act 2006 which brings a maximum sentence of 10 years of instead of 7 years.
The procedure is that individuals are usually invited into council offices or benefit agencies for an interview under Caution, regarding a possible over-payment or allegation(s) of clear-cut fraud(s).
We have for a number of years specialised in these cases and have had success in defending cases in the Court of Appeal where Prosecution Authorities have sought to challenge decisions made by Crown Court Judges in our favour.
This is arguably the most important stage of criminal proceedings for individuals who find themselves subject to a police investigation.
The advice an individual receives can shape and determine whether the police have enough evidence to present to the reviewing officer or Crown Prosecution Service in the determination of a charge.
Putting forward an alibi or advising a client to answer 'no comment' for strategic reasons is one of the decisions us, as skilled lawyers and representatives, must make at the police station.
The advice an individual receives can shape and determine whether the police have enough evidence to present to the reviewing officer or Crown Prosecution Service in the determination of a charge.
Putting forward an alibi or advising a client to answer 'no comment' for strategic reasons is one of the decisions us, as skilled lawyers and representatives, must make at the police station.
Reviews
Be the first to review Amosu Robinshaw Solicitors.
Write a Review
